Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 01:45:05
Server time: 14:14:54, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Brazil25 | Caoimhean | Luzzina | Paulo Nogueira | Twilighty00 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: No Winners in Nukes Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Democratic Socialists

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2354

Description[?]:

Any war that involves nuclear weapons will be the last war on earth, in that it will inevitably result in the destruction of mankind. Thus we propose that no nuclear device ever be used by our proud state, so that we will never have that blood on our hands.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:28:42, February 01, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
MessageWe can advocate for a safer and more environmentally sound world here with no economical or millitary threats. I hope i can have your support on this bill.

Date13:26:43, February 01, 2007 CET
FromSocialist Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
MessageWe are totally in agreement. Also we have proposed it, but he is not passed. Perhaps the times are various, perhaps the times are mature…

Date17:23:45, February 01, 2007 CET
From National Party of Baltusia
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
MessageWe will not condone the destruction of our nation's defences.

Date23:09:28, February 01, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
MessageI am not proposing our National Defences be downgraded. I do propose however, that the Direction of our National defences be altered to one that doesnt Have Nuclear Weapons. Nuclear Weapons are no good for any body, because the result of a nuclear war would be mutual destruction for all involved. If we remove our Nuclear arsenal, this would allow us to put more funding into other areas of our millitary which are more useful, such as ground forces that can be used in humanitarian and peacekeeping missions around the world.

Date02:26:55, February 02, 2007 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
Message"I am not proposing our National Defences be downgraded."
By the very nature of the bill, you are asking the Baltusian people to give up the weapons that safeguard their freedom. It is a downgrade of our national defence.

"Nuclear Weapons are no good for any body"
Last time Baltusia was involved in a war? Anyone? 2089 (ish) was the closest we came in the last three centuries.

"would be mutual destruction for all involved"
Hence the policy of Mutually Assured Destruction which keeps nuclear powers in check.

Date04:19:03, February 02, 2007 CET
FromRevolutionary Democratic Socialists
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
Message"Last time Baltusia was involved in a war? Anyone? 2089 (ish) was the closest we came in the last three centuries."
This just shows that we do not need an expensive and unproductive tool such as nuclear weapons.

"By the very nature of the bill, you are asking the Baltusian people to give up the weapons that safeguard their freedom. It is a downgrade of our national defence."
Its not downgrading, but a reasssesment. We need to reasses our millitary and not have expensive useless weapons, but a well trained and well equiped millitary that can be quickly deploid for any millitary or humanitarian reason, at home or abroad.

Date05:25:40, February 03, 2007 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the No Winners in Nukes Bill
Message"This just shows that we do not need an expensive and unproductive tool such as nuclear weapons."
How do you know that expansionist nations like Deltaria haven't invaded us because of our nuclear arsenal? Seems pretty naive just to write it off like that.

"but a well trained and well equiped millitary that can be quickly deploid for any millitary or humanitarian reason"
We have a well trained and well equipped military, particularly in the air force. Nuclear weapons constitute a realtively small amount of funding compared to simply paying the million odd professional soldiers we have.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 18

no
     

Total Seats: 82

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: "Kubrk" is a Jelbic word that has the colloquial meaning "old man" or "geezer".

    Random quote: "Every month we do not have an economic recovery package, 500 million Americans lose their jobs." - Nancy Pelosi

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 68