Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 00:01:52
Server time: 15:58:07, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): SE33 | TH081 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Adoption Act: Revision of 8082

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2085

Description[?]:

Regarding adoption policy.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:19:54, July 19, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageWhether hetero or homo we belive it is more stable within a couple.

Date04:26:38, July 19, 2005 CET
FromHosengott Nationalists
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageThe traditional family grouping has lead many of past generations onward and has been the basis behind all of our creations we harbour no hatred towards homosexuals so yes any couple of any gender arangement should be allowed however it should be a two person job

Date05:37:49, July 19, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageYou would deny children a competent, loving home purely because you feel it takes two adults living there to successfully raise them? Many single parent families produce wonderful children, and many loving couples produce tearaways. We see no need for this unnecessary restriction.

Date07:34:29, July 19, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageAgreeing with DS...not that anyone cares.

Date16:47:56, July 19, 2005 CET
FromHosengott Nationalists
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageOOC: I still love you libertarians >.>

Date18:44:44, July 19, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic Socialists
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageOOC: Hmm? Who? Oh, are they still a aprty..... ? :-P Nah, seriously I don't get why the LibLibs are doing so badly - we've voted together almost constantly since the end of the Entente, so why are we the largest party and they the second smallest? It doens't make much sense.

Date23:34:01, July 19, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
Message"You would deny children a competent, loving home purely because you feel it takes two adults living there to successfully raise them? Many single parent families produce wonderful children, and many loving couples produce tearaways. We see no need for this unnecessary restriction."

the childed once adopted will stay adopted even if the couple split up or divorce etc.

Also it is true a single parent can bring up a child however this can and often is a financial strain and can result in (however well meaning the guardian is) neglect as the parent must work harder (think as in young children).

Date01:41:59, July 20, 2005 CET
From Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageOOC: Its crap thats what it is. The Entente was over a decade ago, Baltusia. Get over it!

Date16:51:44, July 20, 2005 CET
FromHosengott Nationalists
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageOOC: Nah the people loved the abuse to much ;)

Date09:51:33, July 23, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Party
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageWe've voted similar to the LibLibs too and we're doing alright.

Date07:38:39, July 25, 2005 CET
FromFamily First Party
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageWe would much rather see only couples adopt children, as we believe that the traditional family of two parents is what is best for a child. But we would also rather a child have a parent, as opposed to no parent. We make this decision with a heavy heart, but let all know that we would seriously consider reversing the law should the circumstance warrant.

Date22:31:37, July 25, 2005 CET
FromProgressive Conservative Party
ToDebating the Adoption Act: Revision of 8082
MessageWe have reviewed the case and have learned that all potential adopters are screened though testing, and regulations. Therefor it is our conclusion that single parents will be viable if they pass these tests (as they must). We are reversing our position on this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 45

no
       

Total Seats: 351

abstain
 

Total Seats: 24


Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

Random quote: "The basis of a democratic state is liberty." - Aristotle

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78