We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cutting Regulation on Industry
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2083
Description[?]:
| This bill seeks to cut back regulation on our industry, We will ask them to regulate and cut back environmental damaging emissions. We will operate a government sticker system whereby those products produced in environmentally friendly ways will get a green badge, a yellow badge for those that caue a bit of pollution, an orange for those that produce quite a bit of pollution and a red badge for those that produce too much pollution. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of pollution in industry.
Old value:: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Current: The government enforces moderate pollution restrictions.
Proposed: The government provides pollution prevention guidelines, but does not enforce them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 12:56:39, July 19, 2005 CET | From |  Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Cutting Regulation on Industry |
| Message | But it's step back! |
| Date | 11:06:15, July 20, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the Cutting Regulation on Industry |
| Message | ALFP ... you splashed this bill right in the middle of a hurricane ... which is not pollution related, but is going to change your mind on few aspects related to mankind conservation in long terms (preventing nuclear wars extinctions etc) ... and as you cannot see further than any Bush can ... you will say that a hurricane left you with a question: is ecology needed? ... these who plans an ecologic propagandistic world war from some time on Earth are just about to exult ... On which side are you going to play particracy then ... is my question (!) - to myself ... I suggest that STRONG - "highly restrictive" is not the word, is just the wisdom of fear and the propaganda of war - STRONG is the word, strong enforcement and "reinforcement" with new technologies in the industry is what we should vote for, but momentarily ... as a responsible state we must use these "highly restrictive" words as they belong to the game design (as the only resource suggesting "high responsability") and as we don't wait to see irresponsible people when they will begin to understand, we act NOW with the ireprochable responsible attitude for the situation inflicted - better known from the deserted lands or razed forests as "ecologic earthquake" ... Our country is however poor and has not much to fight against .... On the other hand the ecologic disaster which we interprete like it is today ... it is the fault of the government from before ... 10 or 40 or 60-70 years before ... it is not us who made this an emergency, but it is us who must take the advantage of this change ... the ecology is an attitude similar with good manners and respect and religion, traditons somehow disappeared today ... it will be a good change in the cultural evolution. The best changes are expected from there. I give an example ... I propose the third - highly responsible attitude toward ecology - and after one year you propose to merge smaller farms into larger, you'll see afavourable opinion for your bill, as I will generate it from today (implementing the law I say its needed) ... OK? |
| Date | 11:07:03, July 20, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the Cutting Regulation on Industry |
| Message | We voted NO |
| Date | 07:31:02, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Cutting Regulation on Industry |
| Message | look, that wasn't our proposition!! We voted NO! |
| Date | 02:41:26, July 22, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the Cutting Regulation on Industry |
| Message | You must read that you said in the title of your bill: CUTTING REGULATION ON INDUSTRY, which for me seems not "cutting" industry - which is not my idea too, neither yours - but means to cut the curent regulations ... and there is an alternative for the current law which says what you support (now you say not) or "Industrial pollution is not regulated by the government." ... When I read your bill I believed that you mostly reffer to this alternative ... another way it was to reffer to whatever you haven't said in the title - which alltimes is more important than the content or such importance it has the title enough to determine the sense of the content of the description - please say it is not you who told us the bill with that title and I believe you ... On the other hand the proposal you made was described as a matter of colors not as a matter of technological improvement with significant investitions in this field (from the private owners this effort is hardly believed to come without some enforcement) ... takes time till becomes a new religion and culture, but is not much to say first about these and later about the colors you had upon your mind. I am afraid that we both made a mistake ... you who did not explained it straight from the title ... me who didn't asked you before in debate - but I have the excuse that I wasn't registered as player here at that time ... SUCCESS NEXT TIME ... If you wish so much this law I let you propose it ... the law for the hardest enforcement ... I wait your answer before I put my bill to the vote ... I hope you don't mind for these misunderstandings. MORE SUCCESS AGAIN !! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 202 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 146 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 147 |
| Random fact: By default the head of government is the ultimate authority within a national government. In general terms, heads of government are expected to consult with cabinet colleagues (including those from other parties) before making significant decisions but they remain responsible for government action. |
| Random quote: "Too bad all the people who know how to run the country are busy driving taxi cabs and cutting hair." - George Burns |