Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5471
Next month in: 03:51:25
Server time: 16:08:34, April 18, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): ameerali | blowingnorthwind | burgerboys | dnobb | lulus | saintstiiizy | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Re-Privatisation of Housing Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Social and Liberal Democratic Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2359

Description[?]:

To undo the recent unpopular changes in the law

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:34:35, February 10, 2007 CET
FromModerate Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Privatisation of Housing Act
MessageWe, the MDP, support this bill

Date02:42:53, February 10, 2007 CET
FromModerate Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Privatisation of Housing Act
MessageSorry for the last message. But we've reviewed this, and we prefer it like this: All housing is private but rent is subsidised for low-income households.

Date09:40:00, February 10, 2007 CET
FromOrthodox Movement for a Utopian Society
ToDebating the Re-Privatisation of Housing Act
MessageYes I agree MDP
But if changes are not executed I shall accept the bill

Date12:03:06, February 10, 2007 CET
FromSocial and Liberal Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Privatisation of Housing Act
MessageArticle 1 has been changed. The DLP agrees that this new version is fairer.

Date16:10:58, February 10, 2007 CET
FromOrthodox Movement for a Utopian Society
ToDebating the Re-Privatisation of Housing Act
MessageWe agree and give indefinate support on this socialist kind of thinking. Socialists, my friends

Date21:43:21, February 11, 2007 CET
FromModerate Democratic Party
ToDebating the Re-Privatisation of Housing Act
MessageGreat, now we can see a real co-operation between the parties in this nation.
After the next election I may propose a new cabinet with different parties in it. But before we can do that, we need to see who want to take what etc. I'll contact you.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 449

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 106


    Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining.

    Random quote: "A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject." - Winston Churchill

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57