Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5461
Next month in: 00:07:27
Server time: 19:52:32, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): Caoimhean | SocDemDundorfian | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: A Brave New Dorvik

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Public Employees

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2364

Description[?]:

...

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:01:41, February 10, 2007 CET
From Democratic Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageThere's no need to change our traditional national motto to anything new.

Date20:08:32, February 10, 2007 CET
From Green Freedom Party
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageWe support the current motto.

Date20:35:31, February 10, 2007 CET
From Socialist Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageBoth mottos mean the same thing, so why change it?

Date23:00:35, February 10, 2007 CET
From Revolutionary Anarcho-Nationalist Party
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageWe prefer the status quo

Date11:16:02, February 21, 2007 CET
From Pluralist Movement
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
Message"Both mottos mean the same thing, so why change it?"

Perhaps they're liberals, that's what they do, pretend.

Date22:55:24, February 21, 2007 CET
From Union of Public Employees
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageOOC: There is a difference between a motto including freedom in it and a motto stating Dorvik is for freedom. Thus it implys that Dorvik has no freedom but desires freedom in other nations. Tricky, no?

Date23:34:14, February 21, 2007 CET
From Green Freedom Party
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageIs this being moved to a vote anytime soon?

Date11:47:46, February 22, 2007 CET
From Pluralist Movement
ToDebating the A Brave New Dorvik
MessageThere is also freedom to spell "implies" correctly.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 61

no
     

Total Seats: 176

abstain
 

Total Seats: 40


Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there.

Random quote: "A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin." H. L. Mencken

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 81