Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5471
Next month in: 03:14:45
Server time: 04:45:14, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): shemi64 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: National Defence Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Union of Public Employees

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2358

Description[?]:

We cannot allow a state monopoly on weapons production.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:30:52, February 10, 2007 CET
From Democratic Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the National Defence Act
MessageWe agree with this proposal. Competition creates more jobs, brings investments on the country and private sector is more effective in many areas than the state. Even though we would like to see whole arms industry under the control of the private sector, this is better than the current law.

Date20:08:21, February 10, 2007 CET
FromSocialist Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the National Defence Act
MessageThe government knows more about what it needs than the corporations, who will make more equipment than needed, just for profit.

Date21:18:36, February 10, 2007 CET
From Democratic Party of Dorvik
ToDebating the National Defence Act
MessageThat much fate the LSPD has on military's own supply & equipment experts and civil servants in the ministries of finance & defence, how they cannot make special orders concerning equipment...

Date21:40:09, February 10, 2007 CET
FromUnion of Public Employees
ToDebating the National Defence Act
MessageIf they make more equipment then needed, then the government will still buy as much as needed. Any surplus arms would be sold to close allies, in accordance to Dorvik law.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 181

no
  

Total Seats: 118

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "Society comprises two classes: those who have more food than appetite, and those who have more appetite than food." - Nicolas Chamfort

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55