Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5475
Next month in: 00:35:32
Server time: 19:24:27, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): Dx6743 | HopesFor | LC73DunMHP | Paulo Nogueira | RogueALD | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2358

Details

Submitted by[?]: Phalangists

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2359

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:46:13, February 11, 2007 CET
From Ma'avak
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2358
Message"Whilst we ultimately strive for Jewish control over all of the Promised Land we would much rather see the Zemojad Prta and their hopes for peace in power rather than the anti-semitic and pro-imperialist Akedé Strhosí Grundnyr. What is the reasoning of the Zemojad Prta for proposing this cabinet?"

-- Yechezkel Sheetrit

Date20:04:15, February 11, 2007 CET
FromPhalangists
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2358
Message"Because the Party is planning on folding"

Date13:56:38, February 12, 2007 CET
FromRed Anarchy Faction
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2358
Message"The ASG are surprised by the departure of our allies but not by the Habadasha's disproportionation of the situation. We're anti-Zionist, not anti-Semitic. We're pro Pnték, not pro-empire. If we were, why would we conceal it with the public enjoy overt intent? We do not need to be secretive about our real intent, and we certainly don't need your confused hyperbole to feebly attempt to mask it for us!

We thank the ZP for their support and co-operation over the years and wish their members well for the future."

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 293

no
  

Total Seats: 97

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: When it comes to creating a Cultural Protocol in a Culturally Open nation, players are not necessarily required to provide a plausible backstory for how the nation's cultural background developed. However, the provision of a plausible backstory may be a factor in whether Moderation approves the Cultural Protocol if players in surrounding nations question its appropriateness for their region of the game map.

    Random quote: "An idealist is one who, on noticing that roses smell better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H. L. Mencken

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 49