Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5474
Next month in: 03:10:46
Server time: 08:49:13, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Afpak | Mbites2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2083

Details

Submitted by[?]: CNT/AFL

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2083

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:02:12, July 20, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
MessageLooks OK to us. We will oppose of course, but only formally.

Date21:12:11, July 20, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
MessageIt would be a great honour to serve in a cabinet headed by the CNT/AFL. The usual caveats apply about reserving the right to resign if government parties thwart our environmental agenda, but this is not likely to be an issue with these parties.

Date22:20:20, July 20, 2005 CET
FromDemocractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
MessageI would also be honored to serve.

Whats a Secretary of Infrastructure do exactly?

Date22:42:56, July 20, 2005 CET
FromDemocractic Socialist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
MessageI also propose that you add a member from the libertarian right, preferably ASP.

Date23:08:39, July 20, 2005 CET
From National People's Gang
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
MessageWe'd be happy with this as it is, or with a version which follows the old ICA format.

Date23:18:56, July 20, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
Message@DSP. We thank you for the suggestion, but would inform the CNT/AFL that we would decline any invitation. We are opposed to politicaly meaningless cabinets, and to accept inclusion would dilute considerably the 'flavour' of the cabinet. The Head of Government position has been dominated for too long by one political view. It is in the interests of the country on an international stage for new blood to experience the problems, difficulties and responsibilities of the position. We are still represented by Frances (who is considering retiring for the next elecction) as Head of State.

Date23:25:43, July 20, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2083
Message"Whats a Secretary of Infrastructure do exactly?"
I'm assuming taking care national highway and rail systems, overseeing port and airport authorities, overseeing power grids and that sort of thing.

I'm putting this to a vote then, since there don't seem to be too many objections.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 234

no
  

Total Seats: 137

abstain
   

Total Seats: 79


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "The experience of ages has shown that a man who works on the land is purer, nobler, higher, and more moral... Agriculture should be at the basis of everything." - Mikuláš Gogolský, former Deltarian writer

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 73