We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: New nationality policy
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2084
Description[?]:
Our country should be more open to immigrants. They should gain our nationality after passing some language and historical test. After the elections our party will propose to vote as follows: |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy concerning granting nationality (national of this state without implication of having citizenship rights).
Old value:: Only those born in this country or to nationals receive nationality.
Current: Only those born to nationals become nationals.
Proposed: Anyone receives nationality but immigrants must pass a test to gain nationality.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 04:58:59, July 22, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the New nationality policy |
Message | Nationalities needs to be protected through longer time than the period of a life only ... apparently restrictions in thisfield are these to deserve more ... but only because the kakipitalism systems never tried to recognize other nations ... and because they never considered the own nation as more than a defensive establishment ... Unfortunately there are people like me who thinks nationalities are important for how are divided not for how are restricted and destroyed in personal way Chief wants ... Division begins with the contribution to country evolution (developments etc) ... which makes nations more beautiful for the number of not restrictive laws publicly known ... and for the number of laws-done, finished, thrown to history bulk ... I am talking about change ... the national aspects don't get changed when a large number of foreigners retreat in this country endagered by a war in their country ... but get stronger ... more national is the nation loved for its qualities, but to know them better else way than coming in here we don't know other option ... so I would like the most updated laws for defining a nation ... not the BULK from this list ... however the most interesting seems the alternative you proposed here ... What the hell can I do now ... I don't agree, but still don't want you to feel that I am opposing my ideas to yours just because I don't like you personally which is not true and significant. Lets vote YES |
Date | 11:35:12, July 22, 2005 CET | From | Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front | To | Debating the New nationality policy |
Message | Thank you all for support! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 511 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
Random quote: "I think you should defend to the death their right to march, and then go down and meet them with baseball bats." - Woody Allen, on the Ku Klux Klan |