We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Enviroment Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Democrats of Jakania
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2363
Description[?]:
For the betterment and safety of the people |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards hunting endangered animals.
Old value:: The government enforces no regulations.
Current: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Proposed: Hunting endangered animals is illegal.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Everyone may keep exotic animals, the trade in exotic animals is unregulated.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Proposed: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government does not regulate the quality of drinking water.
Current: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Proposed: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: All wild animals may be kept as pets, without any restrictions or precautions whatsoever.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: The government maintains a list of dangerous wild animals which may not be kept as pets; other wild animals may be kept as pets.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:42:52, February 20, 2007 CET | From | United Democrats of Jakania | To | Debating the Enviroment Bill |
Message | This bill helped me prove something. That is that the SLP lied about how they vote with what they think is right, they are just voting against everyone bill's which are not theres. Morals, yeah right. Scum |
Date | 22:28:26, February 20, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party | To | Debating the Enviroment Bill |
Message | While we feel just as displeased as the United Democrats of Alonia, we must insist that the language used within the Supreme Council is professional and politically correct. Let's all try to discuss this like civilized politicians, please. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 208 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 272 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
Random quote: "The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: abolition of private property." - Karl Marx |