Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5474
Next month in: 00:25:34
Server time: 15:34:25, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | lulus | Paulo Nogueira | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military Reform Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Civil Liberties Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2363

Description[?]:

Calls for all defence industries to be government owned, eliminating privately owned defence industries.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:58:16, February 20, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageNo no no and NO!

Date10:18:48, February 20, 2007 CET
FromAM Feminazi Movement
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageAlthough we agree with article 1, we don't care particularly about two, and disagree with 3, we did have a slight leaning toward this bill. However, in the interests of nationalist unity with the CLP, we shall add our weight of numbers to theirs.

Hail Greater Likatonia.

Date15:13:31, February 20, 2007 CET
FromAM Radical Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
Message#1 - NO
#2 - no
#3 - yes

Overall - sorry, no.

Date16:37:29, February 20, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
Message#1 - Yes
#2 - Mildly yes
#3 - Mildly no

Overall, yes, if brought to a vote.

Date18:52:22, February 20, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageThe LITP would support 2 & 3, but cannot support 1.

Date19:06:30, February 20, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageIt would not hurt the relationship between the CLP and LFFR if the latter voted for this bill. We would be more than happy for the LFFR to take left-wing votes and give the right-wing an even larger majority in government.

Date19:07:55, February 20, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageHowever we should add that overall the LFFR would probably offend their own voters by voting for this bill which seeks to abolish military service and abolish military support of the police.

Date19:12:44, February 20, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageOnce again, the Conservative Liberals fluff their lines, and muddle their words. On the political stage, you seem to play the part of the slapstick clowns. Well done, sirs, well done.

Date19:53:08, February 20, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageThe LITP seem to have lost their sanity. Perhaps they need to be demoted from their current position as the clowns of the Convocation.

Date02:27:38, February 21, 2007 CET
FromCivil Liberties Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageSince there seems to be a relatively close split on this bill amongst all parties, we will separate the proposals into three different bills and begin the voting.



Date02:39:16, February 21, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageThe Axis Mundi Revolution! actively embraces this wonderful legislation.

It cannot possibly be in the best interests of the average Likatonian, to have the any aspect of the defence of the nation dependent upon the profit-and-loss analysis of a private corporation.

Date02:46:04, February 21, 2007 CET
FromCivil Liberties Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageDefence is a matter of public safety and public wellness and therefore it should not be entrusted, even slightly, into the hands of privately owned corporations who can make decisions for their own well being rather than for the benefit of the greater good of the people of Likatonia.

Date02:47:30, February 21, 2007 CET
FromCivil Liberties Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageWe are glad Axis Mundi Rev. supports this bill, and we hope the other parties will as well.

Date02:47:42, February 21, 2007 CET
FromCivil Liberties Party
ToDebating the Military Reform Bill
MessageWe are glad Axis Mundi Rev. supports this bill, and we hope the other parties will as well.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 101

no
   

Total Seats: 79

abstain
 

Total Seats: 19


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "Apparently, a democracy is a place where numerous elections are held at great cost without issues and with interchangeable candidates." - Gore Vidal

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 85