Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5471
Next month in: 03:04:01
Server time: 08:55:58, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): AethanKal | albaniansunited | itsjustgav | shemi64 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Fit for purpose 2

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2364

Description[?]:

The LITP recognises that sometimes, the needs of the community can only be met by members of that community; the needs of sections of society require the members of that section to take on key roles.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:00:38, February 22, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessagePositive Discrimination is discrimination of the majority. Whoever is best suited for the job should get the job regardless of their race, sex, age, religion, political beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality etc.


Date02:49:16, February 22, 2007 CET
FromCivil Liberties Party
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageMay we say for the first time that we agree whole-heartedly with the ConLib Party.

Date08:47:28, February 22, 2007 CET
FromAM Feminazi Movement
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageWe echo previous opinions already expressed.

Date13:33:25, February 22, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageIf this bill gets through, it will be the first bill we propose to remove when the balance of power shifts in the next election. LITP's grip over this Convocation is ending.

Date17:06:52, February 22, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageFrankly, we are disgusted that the 'independent thought' party would be so willing to embrace the divisive mentality we are seeing. We vote against this step towards a ghetto nation.

Date23:03:12, February 22, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageWe also find ourselves in agreement with the ConLibs on this issue.

We oppose all discrimination, and furthermore we would like to note that by devolving the issue it leaves things open for LFFR-controlled local governments to discriminate against minorities just as it might open LITP-controlled governments to discriminate in their favor.

Date09:09:27, February 23, 2007 CET
FromAM Feminazi Movement
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageOOC: PLPL thank you for that inventive observation - something I hadn't even thought of.. with the LFFR being the largest party but unrepresented it is entirely possible there would be fascist dominated councils, this is perhaps a dimension I can make use of in the future. Great roleplay, and thanks!

Date11:15:56, February 23, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the Fit for purpose 2
MessageOOC: No problem. :)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 86

no
      

Total Seats: 113

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

    Random quote: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 69