We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Fit for purpose 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2364
Description[?]:
The LITP recognises that sometimes, the needs of the community can only be met by members of that community; the needs of sections of society require the members of that section to take on key roles. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Positive discrimination.
Old value:: No form of positive discrimination is permitted.
Current: The government does not regulate hiring policies.
Proposed: Hiring policies are regulated by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:00:38, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Democratic National Party | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | Positive Discrimination is discrimination of the majority. Whoever is best suited for the job should get the job regardless of their race, sex, age, religion, political beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality etc. |
Date | 02:49:16, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Civil Liberties Party | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | May we say for the first time that we agree whole-heartedly with the ConLib Party. |
Date | 08:47:28, February 22, 2007 CET | From | AM Feminazi Movement | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | We echo previous opinions already expressed. |
Date | 13:33:25, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Democratic National Party | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | If this bill gets through, it will be the first bill we propose to remove when the balance of power shifts in the next election. LITP's grip over this Convocation is ending. |
Date | 17:06:52, February 22, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | Frankly, we are disgusted that the 'independent thought' party would be so willing to embrace the divisive mentality we are seeing. We vote against this step towards a ghetto nation. |
Date | 23:03:12, February 22, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | We also find ourselves in agreement with the ConLibs on this issue. We oppose all discrimination, and furthermore we would like to note that by devolving the issue it leaves things open for LFFR-controlled local governments to discriminate against minorities just as it might open LITP-controlled governments to discriminate in their favor. |
Date | 09:09:27, February 23, 2007 CET | From | AM Feminazi Movement | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | OOC: PLPL thank you for that inventive observation - something I hadn't even thought of.. with the LFFR being the largest party but unrepresented it is entirely possible there would be fascist dominated councils, this is perhaps a dimension I can make use of in the future. Great roleplay, and thanks! |
Date | 11:15:56, February 23, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Fit for purpose 2 |
Message | OOC: No problem. :) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 86 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 113 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved. |
Random quote: "Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - John Dalberg-Acton |