We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Consistent life ethic
Details
Submitted by[?]: Catholic Workers Movement
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2084
Description[?]:
Whereas human life is sacred in all its manifestations, The government will protect and uphold human life, from conception to natural death. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortions are only allowed in medical emergencies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Current: Euthanasia is only allowed with consent from the patient and a court order.
Proposed: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:58:50, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Catholic Workers Movement | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | This one may be a minority view, but it will establish the Catholic Workers policy on this issue. Capital punishment has been left as a separate bill. |
Date | 18:36:49, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | We strongly oppose this bill, and feel that we should uphold the careful compromise reached in the Regulated Prostitution For A Healthier Beluzia Act. We also oppose changing Beluzia's effective euthanasia laws. |
Date | 18:42:07, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | The FBP opposes this bill. |
Date | 18:47:27, July 21, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Marxist revolutionary Party | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | We will oppose this bill. |
Date | 00:17:42, July 22, 2005 CET | From | Partisans And Artisans League | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | You've got our support on both articles. |
Date | 16:41:12, July 22, 2005 CET | From | Free Beluzians | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | ((Bill will not pass, NMRP, SLP, and FBP hold a majority)) |
Date | 18:03:45, July 22, 2005 CET | From | Catholic Workers Movement | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | No, bill won't pass. Sometimes however it is necessary to go on the record on matters of principle. This is one of those times. (Sorry, but i want to establish the religious voting record profile, like SLP did for economic policy.) |
Date | 01:31:20, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Social-Liberal Party | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | ((OOC: Sure, np. )) |
Date | 09:02:23, July 23, 2005 CET | From | Beluzian Labor Party | To | Debating the Consistent life ethic |
Message | Labor stands firm with the Catholic Workers Movement on this issue. OOC: And hates the CWM for stealing its constituency :P |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 133 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 167 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362 |
Random quote: "Rarely is the question asked: is our children learning?" - George W. Bush |