We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Jakanian Armed Forces Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2369
Description[?]:
| Jakanian Armed Forces Act: Proposed By: Liberal Democratic Party Introduction Explanation: This Resolution would seek to recognize the military of United Jakania in a new set of titles. Section I: Army Article 1) The Army of United Jakania is revised to a current title of: United Land Forces of Jakania Section II: Navy & Air Force Article 1 & 2) The Navy of United Jakania and the Air Force of United Jakania is revised to a current title of: United Air & Naval Forces of Jakania Section IV: Special Forces Branches Article 1) The Special Forces of United Jakania is revised to a current title of: Supreme Jakanian Special Forces |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:51:14, February 28, 2007 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party | To | Debating the Jakanian Armed Forces Act |
| Message | We currently know nothing of a certified and official group of titles for our military. Seeing how we are entering war, we thought that it would be best to establish a recognized name for our forces so it is easier and more official. |
| Date | 08:19:22, February 28, 2007 CET | From | Scientific Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Jakanian Armed Forces Act |
| Message | "Armed Forces" tends to imply the entirety of the military, does it not? Would this not be a better term for the entire organization, and a more army-specific term found for our land forces? |
| Date | 16:02:00, February 28, 2007 CET | From | Jakanian Liberal Socialists | To | Debating the Jakanian Armed Forces Act |
| Message | We might actually suggest the merging of the Naval and Air forces into a single branch, or suggest a different way of classifying our forces. ( Modern, RL military forces are great, but ultimately it's based more on tradition than anything else. I mean, the air force can't operate away from home without a navy, and on top of this many countries' navies have more planes than their air force does. It's mainly because planes are a modern development and weren't so naval reliant during things like WW2 that they have their own establishment ) We would suggest: Land Forces Joint air and naval force, acting as a support and projection force Special forces Not by those names obviously, we're just suggesting divisions. Decreased bureaucracy and increased integration should suit our military forces well. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 480 | |||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English. |
| Random quote: "If men want to oppose war, it is statism that they must oppose." - Ayn Rand |