Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5474
Next month in: 01:15:55
Server time: 06:44:04, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: An end to the golden handshake

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Populist Social Democrats

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2367

Description[?]:

Whereas, the previous budget proposal passed despite the opposition of parties we thought we had compromised with by allowing their corporate welfare/golden handshake expenditures,

We hope in this proposal to eliminate golden handshake funds, leaving only those funds in Trade and Industry needed for other purposes.

If it fails, we are no worse off for trying.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:41:06, February 28, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the An end to the golden handshake
MessageThis bill is an outrage. The PopLibs are just taking a political dig at this party, nothing more.

Date22:32:33, February 28, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the An end to the golden handshake
MessageWe like this. It is not perfect, but it is less of an insult to The People of Likatonia than the current 'gift to big business'.

Date02:17:14, March 01, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the An end to the golden handshake
MessageWe absolutely want to state that this is not a political dig at the ConLibs.

It is what we see as a saner use of budgetary resources, using resources to help the people rather than the powerful.

Note we actually increased (a little) infrastructure spending, as there is value to all Likatonians in having a top-level infrastructure; but we see no value in corporate welfare.

This includes not only more funding for social and educational spending (keeping education-- and an educated populace also attracts business-- the top-funded department in the budget), but increases law enforcement (internal affairs and justice), especially important because local governments are not allowed to have their own police forces, as well as science and technology development, all of which are good for the populace but outside of the social spending increases also make Likatonia a better place for businesses to locate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
      

Total Seats: 122

no
 

Total Seats: 30

abstain
  

Total Seats: 47


Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: Although I understand and respect the intentions behind the gesture, this is not something that is universally understood or appreciated, and it tends to give out a negative impression of our party. ~ Anton Weinreich, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party, pleading with his members to stop burning the national flag

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52