We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Private Correspondence Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolutionary Democratic Socialists
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2367
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:16:51, March 01, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Private Correspondence Bill |
| Message | This puts the onus on justice department to have reasons for violating someones privacy, not on the person to prove their innocence, |
| Date | 23:54:21, March 01, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Private Correspondence Bill |
| Message | The justice department can still have access to these documents, but only if they have a grounded cause. It just means they cant just fish through peoples correspondence looking for something incriminating. |
| Date | 00:20:38, March 02, 2007 CET | From |  Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Private Correspondence Bill |
| Message | What in the current law states that it is that way? "Extreme situations" implies that you not only need a grounded cause (as proven to a magistrate) but a fucking good cause to be able to start rifling through people's stuff. |
| Date | 01:35:20, March 02, 2007 CET | From | Revolutionary Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Private Correspondence Bill |
| Message | But extreme situations is vague. It doesnt imply grounded cause is needed, just for an extreme situation. |
| Date | 11:59:09, March 02, 2007 CET | From | Txurruka/Aperribai/Mayoz's OPX | To | Debating the Private Correspondence Bill |
| Message | Grounded cause is vague. What exactly is a grounded cause? How rigorous is a grounded cause? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 71 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 119 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: "Doxxing", or the publishing of personally identifiable information about another player without permission, is forbidden. |
| Random quote: "Politics is the art of the possible." - Otto von Bismarck |