Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5460
Next month in: 00:54:53
Server time: 11:05:06, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Food Safety policy - with less corruption and more provincial cultures

Details

Submitted by[?]: MetaMenorPhists Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2085

Description[?]:

Current:
There are no food standards provisions.
Proposal:
The government recommends food safety standards, but they are not enforced upon businesses.

Below the explanation (started sometime ago it was opposed in debate of ALF Party's bill proposal to the idea that this country needs continuously from now on to "bill" provisions which already use, this being a temptation for corruption or insecurity ... typical to all countries from nowhere, no people, no traditions, no culture ... ALF proposed this:
The government introduces, and actively enforces, food standards provisions. Here is why we were against and why we propose our new bill):

(quote from previous debate) Current:
"there are no food standards provisions" ... which means there food standards, but as we may have different provisions from a region to another, country to another, north to south etc we can introduce only these provisions already in use by our country - which is senseless as we already use food standards provisions, but we (only) don't have them "billed" ... these are provided by the producers in accord with the security regarding health of the consummers. The only food standards provisions we may think of are these "not respected" by "not respectable" providers ... This bill will try to remove the check of the food standards from the level of producers to the level of providers and this may only reffer to a bad imported food (system) we may have or to a better protection we try to offer to producers from our own country - blaming the providers of exported food, instead of blaming producers of the food - these making from "food" a criminal activity rather than one meant to protect consummers. I prefere to improve the imported food systems directly and to upgrade this bill directly to the level of "a new commision for food standards provisions" with teritorrial activities all over the country provinces ... make a resolution in this direction and will be voted YES I can ad that the provisions are a very good source of corruption inside the legislative rooms as long as they are oftenly asked to vote in favour of some standards provisions and against others. While being discussed in a permanent commission aside from the legislative representations the results will stand in the favor of the traditional markets and producers without making producers to fight for unreasonable standards for a country we may have also poor also rich ... depending from where you look to it.
I don't say that I am not voting YES, I say you should recheck and propose a resolution for a commission of control and food standards provisions. (american way ... is it? ... bah, they chosed this way in oil business, in food business they attacked the way readable in your proposal, and you see McDonald as a great success because it fights against standard provisions with a small slice of food, try a New Chain of Restaurants ... pretty much harder, is it?) Food is important resource of neighborhoods around your place ... this is our best way ... provisions make neighborhoods already known before you want to get there ... so, why to go?? Cultures lives only on bases of free traditional food chains or travels for it ... and it seems that you drive us to the Big but small slice of McDonald everywhere ... sorry!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 38

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
          

    Total Seats: 489


    Random fact: Moderation will not approve a Cultural Protocol request within the first 48 hours of it being requested. This is in order to give other players a chance to query the proposed changes, if they wish to do so. Moderation may be approached for advice on a proposed change, but any advice proffered should always be understood under the provisio that no final decision will be made until at least 48 hours after the request has been formally submitted for approval.

    Random quote: "Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people." - Karl Marx

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 31