We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Euthanasia Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarchosyndicalist Libertarian Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2085
Description[?]:
| Every man has right to decide about his own life. We believe that in some cases pain could be terminal and one doesn't want to live anymore. So we want to introduce a Euthanasia Act. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The right to euthanasia.
Old value:: Euthanasia is illegal and considered murder.
Current: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Proposed: Euthanasia is allowed with consent from the patient and the treating doctor.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:15:01, July 23, 2005 CET | From |  Red Faction | To | Debating the Euthanasia Act |
| Message | What the heck, why not ... this opens doors for some minor accidents if needed :) |
| Date | 00:26:20, July 24, 2005 CET | From | MetaMenorPhists Party | To | Debating the Euthanasia Act |
| Message | This opens door to no accidents ... the law is rejected in countries were the state of illness on the edge of death ... is legally used to enforce some people and torture others in a very legallised form ... the consent from patient is also maintaining this situation ... yourself being in the arms of death, and your family enforced to speak stupid things or do similar things for the sake of a dead corpse (you) with a tear of life in it ... would not be same great ... would be? I would suggest a more complex law which is not available here ... the law would say that if till now the responsibility belonged to governmental authorities to establish if people have the right to euthanasia or not ... from now on the responsibilty must lay on the same shoulders, just that euthanasia is allowed ... You know who is guilty this time ... if no one cares about a patient - who, by the way cannot give his consent in some of the cases ... but if they still want to keep euthanasia as a casus belli legal tool against freedom ... but this happens while being on top of the freedom of speech claimed by newspapers (with idiot journalists and asses) ... well if the real world does these ... i strongly sggest to overview it from a better point of view ... At least till now we knew who is on euthanasia's list and who died by accident ... from now on we lose even this evidences or the interest for them ... but we gain the access of the public into a business not quite clear to everyone ... we vote YES. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 217 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 89 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 221 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow official national flags of real-life nations or flags which are very prominent and recognisable (eg. the flags of the European Union, the United Nations, Nazi Germany, the Soviet Union or the Confederate States of America). |
| Random quote: "There are many men of principle in both parties in America, but there is no party of principle." - Alexis de Tocqueville |