Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5474
Next month in: 00:59:34
Server time: 11:00:25, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): rezins | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Military REform Act 2369

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2370

Description[?]:

Military spending eats up tax money, it costs the country huge amounts of money, that is not spend correctly. Speninding money on nuclear weapons, for instance, is a waste. Recognising this, we propose:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:19:21, March 05, 2007 CET
FromMilitant Libertarian Front
ToDebating the Military REform Act 2369
MessageThe Military is the one of the means by which the government carries out its legitimate function: defending individual rights.

Date22:19:43, March 05, 2007 CET
FromMilitant Libertarian Front
ToDebating the Military REform Act 2369
Messageit should have every option available to do this.

Date03:58:37, March 06, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Military REform Act 2369
MessageAgainst every single one of them. I agree with MLF. The military is the most critical need of a small government because it defends us from foreign invaders who could impose a larger government. It thus should be able to have no regulations in its defense of us.

Date13:36:53, March 06, 2007 CET
FromFederal Social Democratic Party
ToDebating the Military REform Act 2369
MessageWe are not against defending ourselves, but these are not the wepons to do it with. Let's see
1. If neighbours attack us, our nations are small, using WMD's against them will harm us as much.
2. Foreign invaders who want to impose big government,first of all, this is ludicrus, second, they will want to invade us. If your aim is invasion, you do not use WMD's as this makes the country unusable, and therefor not good for invasion. Therefor WMDs is also not a deterent.

We are all for a strong, convetional force, but not, I say again, NOT these unethical, expensive weapons.

Finally, having these weapons makes our neighbours uneasy, as our current MLF government is seeming more and more to be rogue, and nobody like WMD's in the hands of rogue's.

But I am not supoirsed by the oposition of the MLF government and it's ICP cronies, it is all part of the Libertarian-Anarchist hipocracy - we don't want to steal for the individual to help the poor, but we WILL steal form the individual to buy expensive weapons we will never use!!!!!

Date01:05:40, March 07, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Capitalist Party
ToDebating the Military REform Act 2369
MessageOur taxes are low, but I don't want us to not exhaust all our options when it's wartime.

Date12:07:50, March 07, 2007 CET
FromMilitant Libertarian Front
ToDebating the Military REform Act 2369
Messagerubbish...the role of government is to defend individual rights. I concede we don't yet have a voluntarily funded state but when we do it will need to be able to defend its citizens.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 71

no
   

Total Seats: 529

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Don't put "the" as the first word in your party name, because when parties are referred to in news reports, their names are preceded with "the", e.g. the [Socialist Party] has lost.

    Random quote: "Envy is the cause of political division." - Democritus

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 72