We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Particracy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Centrist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2370
Description[?]:
Partycracy act |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Education for children under adult age.
Old value:: Education is compulsory and has to happen at school.
Current: Education is compulsory, but home schooling is permitted.
Proposed: Education is compulsory, but home schooling is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Tax percentage of the profit made by corporations.
Old value:: 25
Current: 9
Proposed: 22
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation allows for imports, but imposes tariffs and quotas in certain areas.
Current: The nation allows for imports, but imposes tariffs and quotas in certain areas.
Proposed: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: Nuclear power plants are not permitted.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:13:53, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Particracy Act |
Message | Remove Articles V and VI, and you have our full support. |
Date | 20:36:00, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Particracy Act |
Message | The proposal is OK except of the articles 6, 7 and 8. Unless you remove them the CDA will vote against the proposal. PS: the fact that you put a constitutional proposal in your bill, makes that two-thirds of the legislature has to support it. This also goes for non-constitutional proposals as they are in the same bill as the constitutional one. |
Date | 23:26:46, March 05, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Particracy Act |
Message | Hmmm....you'ev added new proposals!! Just to clarify, it is now articles II, VI, VII and VIII that we object to (tax, cannabis, electoral system and slander laws). Remove them, and we can support this! (In the case of tax - it should equal zero!) |
Date | 00:10:18, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Particracy Act |
Message | I've taken out VI, VII, and VIII. Article 2 must stay. I support a tax cut but not dropping it to zero instantly. I would like to see it go down gradually. Therefore I request my partner RIR to support this bill as it is and to create its own tax bill with another tax cut. (A range of 10 to 15 is my aim.) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 75 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 50 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Before choosing a nation, you may wish to research it first. For more information on the cultural backgrounds of the nations, please see the Cultural Protocols Index: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6365 |
Random quote: "We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant." - Karl Popper |