We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2369
Details
Submitted by[?]: S.C.A.F.R.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2371
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the S.C.A.F.R.
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Communist Party of Aldegar
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Social Democrats
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Communist Party of Aldegar
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Communist Party of Aldegar
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the S.C.A.F.R.
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the S.C.A.F.R.
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Social Democrats
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the S.C.A.F.R.
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the S.C.A.F.R.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:47:28, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | We are more than pleased with this proposal! |
| Date | 15:20:38, March 06, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | We think that is the best governement that this Nation would desire. |
| Date | 20:36:58, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | If no additional comments arise in the debate I suggest we proceed to a vote in a couple of hours? |
| Date | 10:11:11, March 07, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | The TCP has noticed that they do not have any representatives in the proposal - and yet, the TCP finds this interesting as the TCP is the party with the most seats in this nation's parliament. Therefore it is rediculous to not include even one member of the TCP in the proposal, and shows the inherant prejudices and bias of the SCA. The TCP has also noticed that this cabinet proposal is filled to the brim, and overflowing, with representatives from every different flavour of mix and match leftist parties this nation has to offer. The TCP has in turn noticed that this proposal is incredibly, incredibly bias and narrow. Obviously, the TCP will never support this proposal. |
| Date | 10:49:32, March 07, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | Coalitions are made between parties that share similar views. The SD is pleased that the left-wing coalition has enough votes to keep the right-wing TCP out. That is the parliamentary way - every party has to form alliances if they alone have too few seats. |
| Date | 13:14:36, March 07, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | TCP has to present his proposal. In the Governement Ratti Viscynky the TCP is not considered an ally. We don't stay in governement with TCP. |
| Date | 15:40:47, March 07, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | To others Socialists Party: i've considered you as Allies, even if you didn't support me at last elections. Even the TCP didn't had voted to me, but is a right-wing party. My policy in this Governement is made by tollerance, but i'm not a saint. In which times i can recall election or a new cabinet proposal. |
| Date | 22:00:05, March 07, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | ALSP??? |
| Date | 16:04:55, March 08, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | Next month we'll present a new proposal of cabinet, without the ALSP. |
| Date | 16:39:40, March 08, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | We feel this is a bad idea because we cannot have a cabinet with TCP. We do not have enough votes. Unfortunately we will have to stay as we are or perhaps propose new elections. |
| Date | 00:06:40, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | OOC: Sorry, I've been unable to log on because the internet on my school have been out of order. Also, I'd rather not be in the cabinet at this point in time as I'll soon be unable to get online again. I'm a pupile on a boarding school and the school is going to have a new school trip next week. That means no internet for a week... The school I'm on is www.fosen.fhs.no btw, there is a english page there somewhere if anyone is interested. Anyway, sorry again for not showing up and good luck. |
| Date | 00:12:07, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | ALSP needs to support one bill so a cabinet is formed, otherwise we will need new elections! |
| Date | 00:13:01, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | ALSP needs to support one bill so a cabinet is formed, otherwise we will need new elections! Accept and resign if need be, just this standstill must end! |
| Date | 00:19:13, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2369 |
| Message | OOC: Sorry, I've been without internet a few days now, it simply stoped working. And out here there isn't any alternatives if one internet conection don't work. IC: I'm sorry to inform you that the ALSP can't join the cabinet at this time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 323 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 269 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 58 |
| Random fact: There are two countries based on Egypt in the game. Cobura is based on modern Egypt with a retro twist, while Hawu Mumenhes is based on Ancient Egypt with a modernist twist. |
| Random quote: "I believe that guns don't kill people, husbands that come home early do." - Larry the Cable Guy |