We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty against fascism
Details
Submitted by[?]: S.C.A.F.R.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2371
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Treaty against fascism. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty against fascism.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:22:03, March 06, 2007 CET | From | S.C.A.F.R. | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | It's time to ratify,we have the possibility. |
| Date | 17:29:22, March 06, 2007 CET | From | Greenpeace Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | We are to ratify. |
| Date | 01:00:08, March 08, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | The TCP reminds the rest of the parties of this nation that if they succeed in passing this treaty against fascism, that is one more step towards driving the TCP out of this nation. The TCP is sure that this is what the other nations would undoubtably want, but the TCP reminds the other parties how absolutely one sided everything would be should the TCP leave the nation. All other parties have already essentially fused into some kind of puree of leftist and marxist ideologies, and with the TCP gone there would be nothing to keep this gigantic marxist party in check. |
| Date | 10:30:59, March 08, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | So the TCP admits that it is Fascist? |
| Date | 10:48:04, March 08, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | By no means is the TCP a fascist party, but certain policies in the treaty against fascism are against what the TCP stands for. Therefore the TCP will not support this bill. |
| Date | 10:53:48, March 08, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | There is no credible coalition at the moment to insure a 2/3 majority. We are in accordance with this treaty so there is no present worries. It will, however remain on the agenda when we will secure a sufficient majority. |
| Date | 00:50:52, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | The ALSP regret that it couldn't show up to this vote. However it's representatives to the grand council is in hiding after a bombing of the party headquarter. We belive it is arranged by the Somasian Mafiosi and although we have no proof that the TCP is involved we wish to remind the party that we will not stop existing because of treats like that. The party will soon leave the grand council as no one can guarantee the safety of our representatives at this time. We hope our grand country can once again be safe to live in also for politicians. |
| Date | 10:27:52, March 12, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | The TCP strongly resents any claims that the party would ever be involved in a terrorist cell of any description. Terrorism is number one on the list of problems the TCP would like to eradicate completely, with an iron fist - it is an insult, of course, that the TCP should be so much as mentioned in the same sentance as the 'Somasian Mafiosi'. The TCP reminds the ALSP, again, that the party believes terrorist behaviour is one of the most abhorrent things on this planet; that includes things like bombing and attacking out of opposition to a particular religious or political perspective. Such suspicions that the TCP could be involved in such a thing are unsubstantiated, and the TCP perceive these claims to be a simple cheap shot tactic by the ALSP to discredit the TCP's highly tarnished reputation amongst this fine nation's voters. |
| Date | 12:28:13, March 12, 2007 CET | From | Social Democrats | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty against fascism |
| Message | In the view of the SD, any kind of (quote) iron fist (unquote) policy is very near terrorism. Not leniency, but dialogue should be encouraged. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 323 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 269 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 58 |
| Random fact: Party candidates for head of state elections are not visible to the public. This means that you cannot see who will run and who will not, which adds another strategic element to the elections. |
| Random quote: "The basis of a democratic state is liberty." - Aristotle |