We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal
Details
Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Alternative
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2372
Description[?]:
| In the Continental Congress, the Cibona from Davostan outlined a new idea on leadership for the Union of Macon, which puts more emphasise on a devolved government. This resolution calls on Parliament to review this proposal as a compromise. See Continental Congress Message from 17:35:30, March 08, 2007 CET from the Cibona. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:51:49, March 08, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | If I understand it correctly, then I support it. I am still waiting for the clarification to my concerns upon which I will be in a better position to declare my true position on it. I like Davostan's representative and the negotating skills he has shown up to now. |
| Date | 12:03:07, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | So am I, I also like his ability to negotiate. This proposal is an alternative to the present system and is good, because of its devolved and intergovernmental nature. |
| Date | 16:52:22, March 09, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | But the Socialist Workers' Party object to it. I guess that is not what HE had in mind, again. |
| Date | 09:11:45, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | As a right wing voter. I cannot support this. |
| Date | 18:50:47, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | "But the Socialist Workers' Party object[s] to it. I guess that is not what HE had in mind, again." Indeed, it wasn't what I had in mind. I remain skeptical of its feasibility only because I know the problems inactive parties can cause when voting relies on individual parties, and also because I don't think it includes enough parties. However, I have supported it because I think it stands the best chance of passing. Please get your facts straight before you jump to attack me. |
| Date | 20:45:25, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | My goodness. You are everywhere. You will make comments on every bill in Hutori? Do you read every bill of every country (all 52 countries) or you just interfere in your neighbors business? BANG! That was such a loaded and unfair question. LOL. |
| Date | 21:48:50, March 11, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Resolution on a new Union Leadership proposal |
| Message | Nah, I just poke my nose into the business of my Union partners. Honestly it makes the game more fun. I'd recommend you do the same, keep an eye on Telamon and make comments with regards to the Union. It will foster a continental community and make the game more exciting. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 58 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 67 |
| Random fact: Particracy is completely free! If you want to support the game financially, feel free to make a small donation to the lievenswouter@gmail.com Paypal account. |
| Random quote: "There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need but not for man's greed." - Mahatma Gandhi |