We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Con Libs proposals
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2372
Description[?]:
For a better Likatonia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning farm size.
Old value:: Farm size regulations are determined by local governments.
Current: Farm size is not regulated.
Proposed: Farm size is not regulated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Current: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Proposed: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: Private companies are responsible for disposing of their own waste. The government disposes of residential waste.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: Waste disposal is left entirely to the private sector and is unregulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:53:48, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Socijal-Demokratska Partija | To | Debating the Con Libs proposals |
Message | We cant support article 3. We support article 1 and 2. SSP |
Date | 12:54:21, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Likaton Coalition of the Willing | To | Debating the Con Libs proposals |
Message | We support all except 3. |
Date | 14:40:50, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Con Libs proposals |
Message | Waste disposal is unregulated? Is there no low to which the ConLibs will NOT sink? So - we can have random dumping... trash in the streets? Industrial waste in residential zones? Chemical and nuclear dumping in the playgrounds of children's schools? The ConLibs are really willing to sell even basic safety for a few Liks? |
Date | 14:51:12, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Democratic National Party | To | Debating the Con Libs proposals |
Message | This is a proposal which not only have we proposed before, but one which was government policy for some time. Waste removal was far more efficient. |
Date | 15:25:03, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Con Libs proposals |
Message | We find it amusing that the ConLibs would think to argue historical precedent as a good reason to support something. By the same token, the ConLibs should support the good 'Axis Mundi' name of Likatonia - since the 'historical precedent' favours it. We also note: while the ConLibs claim that 'waste removal was far more efficient' - they fail to address the possible abuses of de-regulation - like dumping industrial waste in domestic areas. That would be 'efficient', but it wouldn't be good. |
Date | 22:10:51, March 11, 2007 CET | From | AM Populist Social Democrats | To | Debating the Con Libs proposals |
Message | Also, if one cannot afford to pay to have one's waste removed, then they are forced to live in filth. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 68 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 131 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: To see what other nations are up to and to actively involve yourself in international activities: check the Roleplaying section on the forum! Don't be shy to make a news post about your party's recent achievements. |
Random quote: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people and neither do we." - George W. Bush |