We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Healthcare Manifesto of the ILP
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperium et Libertas Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2373
Description[?]:
Firstly, there is absolutely no reason why we should subsidise the cost of medicine for those who can afford it. Secondly, once again, we have laws in place that leave matters in the hand of central government that would be better handled by the regions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Health care policy.
Old value:: Health care is private, but is paid for by the state for people with low incomes.
Current: There is a free public health care system and a small number of private clinics, which are heavily regulated to ensure they treat their patients well and provide good care.
Proposed: There is a public health care system, but private clinics are allowed.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Current: The government pays partially for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs, and pays entirely for those of low income citizens.
Proposed: The government supplies free pharmaceutical drugs to those on low incomes.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 19:19:21, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Justicial Party - Solidarity | To | Debating the Healthcare Manifesto of the ILP |
Message | While there are some good ideas here, the CJP cannot support article 2 (which opens the chance of lax safety in industry) or article 3 (which opens the chance that cannabis may become legal in some areas). |
Date | 20:28:30, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Imperium et Libertas Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Manifesto of the ILP |
Message | If we drop article III are you prepared to reconsider your stance on article II? (This would, after all, only lead to the possibility of cannabis being a legal drug under medical supervision. It doesn't legalise it for recreational use). |
Date | 20:40:31, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Manifesto of the ILP |
Message | We can only accept article 4 |
Date | 22:43:24, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Healthcare Manifesto of the ILP |
Message | We can only support article II. |
Date | 23:49:06, March 10, 2007 CET | From | Imperium et Libertas Party | To | Debating the Healthcare Manifesto of the ILP |
Message | We'll break this up into seperate bills. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 58 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 97 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Character names must appear plausible and should consist of at least a first name and a surname. Exceptions to this will only be granted at Moderation's discretion and where a very strong case has been presented |
Random quote: "Democracy means simply the bludgeoning of the people by the people for the people." - Oscar Wilde |