Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5472
Next month in: 02:43:40
Server time: 05:16:19, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Vilnius | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: AMELIP Managing Liberties

Details

Submitted by[?]: Likaton Coalition of the Willing

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2373

Description[?]:

We feel that in some areas, we do not support our citiznes enough.

No one should gain additional or alternative rights regarding marriage, based on race or nationality. This is just discrimination.

In order to protect children we propose that all would be parents should pass a qualifying test. The test should be administered for minimal cost, but parents circumventing should be fined as well as monitored.

We propose the establishment of a 'Child Support Agency' to manage this.

Finally, in order to investigate serious crimes, the police sould have the power to invoke Habeas Data (or Datum) once a court order is obtained. This only applies to documentary data, and cannot be used to force an individual to verbally incriminate themself.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:35:06, March 13, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the AMELIP Managing Liberties
MessageThis looks good, thus far.

Date06:29:38, March 13, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the AMELIP Managing Liberties
MessageOur caucus is highly divided on this issue,. Article 1 is something we firmly support. Article 2 is controversial within out caucus. Many members support Article 2, but many others claim that it would infuriate our working-class constituency. Article 3 we oppose, seeing no reason to say to anyone "You were married, but not *here*, so we refuse to recognize it."

Therefore, we have yet to form an opinion on which way to vote on this proposal.

Date12:47:24, March 13, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the AMELIP Managing Liberties
Messagein terms of recognition, this simply prevents marriages that wouldn't be sanctioned internally being obtained overseas and thus having legal status here

Date16:07:39, March 13, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the AMELIP Managing Liberties
MessageWhile we recognize that fact, we worry of the day when some authoritarian group of parties may outlaw same-sex marriage or something of that sort, and in that case we prefer that there be an alternative route for such people to get married.

That said, we have decided to support this bill, as we strongly believe in Article 1, and we also believe in Article 2 and will support the bill despite possible negative electoral repurcussions.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 120

no
   

Total Seats: 79

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra.

    Random quote: "Forgive your enemies, but never forget their names." - John F. Kennedy

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 65