Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 00:21:25
Server time: 15:38:34, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): Arusu-Gad | Arusu-Weareback | hexaus18 | SE33 | starfruit | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budgeting for all the new Convocation members

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Populist Social Democrats

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2374

Description[?]:

We would prefer not to have to propose this budget, as we believe that the major expansions we need to the Convocation building to house double the number of MP's it housed at its peak is completely unnecessary.

However, we must accept that the will of the Convocation is to become huge.

We have therefore taken out bonds to amortize the expansion over the next ten years, at a total cost of 4 million LIK per year. The additional expenses beyond that added to the HoG budget-- as we knew not where else to put them-- are to cover the salaries of the new members.

We may be accused-- accurately-- of often enjoying increasing spending. This is not so in this case, but is unfortunately necessary.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:02:04, March 14, 2007 CET
FromRight Wing Liberals Party
ToDebating the Budgeting for all the new Convocation members
MessageI'm sure the buildings size is acceptable, judging by previous parliaments.

Date13:59:09, March 14, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Budgeting for all the new Convocation members
MessageWhy would we give so much money to a HoG that we don't actually have last time I checked.

Date22:04:17, March 14, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Budgeting for all the new Convocation members
MessageOOC: I'm certain the Convocation has been 501 candidates previously. I'm fairly sure it has been 666, at least once.

Date07:36:22, March 15, 2007 CET
FromAM Populist Social Democrats
ToDebating the Budgeting for all the new Convocation members
Message"Why would we give so much money to a HoG that we don't actually have last time I checked."

The money is for expansion of the Convocation building and the ability to pay the salaries of 666 members. We didn't know where else in the budget to place it. It is most definitely not intended as an increase in the HoG salary, whether the HoS remains the HoG or whether he does not.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 108

no
   

Total Seats: 78

abstain
 

Total Seats: 13


Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362

Random quote: As for rape, of course, that is a direct consequence of the capitalist system of oppression. Capitalism relies on fuelling division and resentment to sustain itself, and so it sets men against women, race against race and so on. Men rape women because they are being oppressed by capitalism, so they take it out on women. Under Communism, there will be no rape, because there will be a full and natural harmony and equality between the genders. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58