Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5474
Next month in: 02:32:41
Server time: 01:27:18, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Likaton Reformation Party

Details

Submitted by[?]: AM Feminazi Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2375

Description[?]:

Religion. Economics. Defence.

Blut und Boden.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:02:36, March 15, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Likaton Reformation Party
MessageA word on Article 10:

Previous ConLib proposal: "Prisoners of war are treated according to the national laws of the captor power." (in other words, our laws)

What did the Axis Mundi Sturm und Drang Partei say about it?

"Really, we are dismayed... devolving basic human rights protection for POW's?.. the Conservative Liberals present a real danger to the citizens of this nation....the ConLibs are inhuman monsters. Anyone who would, in all seriousness,...remove protections from POW's...has no regard for human life."

Proposal from the Axis Mundi coalition partner of the Axis Mundi Sturm und Drang Partei:

"Surrendering enemy combatants are summarily executed."

Let's see if the Axis Mundi Sturm und Drang Partei are at the very least, equally critical of their coalition partners as they were of the ConLibs when we proposed a bill far more humane than this one. We won't hold our breath as we know that the Axis Mundi Sturm und Drang Partei can't see passed their hatred for the ConLibs.

Date13:04:10, March 15, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Likaton Reformation Party
Message(awaiting the Axis Mundi Sturm und Drang Partei to dodge the issue and go on a rant about the ConLibs)

Date13:20:07, March 15, 2007 CET
From Likaton Coalition of the Willing
ToDebating the Likaton Reformation Party
MessageWe are entertained that this legislation would be presented, and horrified that it would be drafted in the first place.

We cannot support, even in Western Likatonia.

Date21:37:08, March 15, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Likaton Reformation Party
MessageAs the ConLibs suggest, we are horrified at the brutality shown here by some in the AM LRM. We do not sanction, in any way, this platform.

Date22:48:51, March 15, 2007 CET
FromDemocratic National Party
ToDebating the Likaton Reformation Party
Message"shown here by 'some' in the AM LRM"

The ConLibs are baffled as to why the Sturm und Drang Partei are so soft on this proposal yet were strenuoulsy against and launched a scathing attack against our party when we proposed that POW's be treated according to Likatonia's Laws.

We note the abstaintion of the Sturm und Drang Partei too.

Date02:59:19, March 16, 2007 CET
FromCommonwealth Workers Army
ToDebating the Likaton Reformation Party
MessageWe are a little more easy-going on the AM LRM because we agree on other issues - which suggests that those areas where we conflict are representative of factionalism within parties.

On the other hand, we've pretty much had a history of butting heads with the ConLibs, so we tend to view every platform as a statement of either political positioning, or central ideal.

Perhaps it is wrong to act in such a manner.

Why certainly find nothing laudable about the ConLib proposal for POW's... but we like the LRM proposal even less.

Of course, our refusal to commit votes for or against, is purely political. We have not wished to endorse either the passage or failure of this bill. Having seen the votes cast, we feel we should support the majority. So, we vote against.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 36

no
     

Total Seats: 109

abstain
  

Total Seats: 54


Random fact: Whilst the use of non-English languages can be appropriate for nation names, party names, constitutional titles and other variables, English is the official language of communication in the game. All descriptive texts and public communications should be in English or at least appear alongside a full English translation.

Random quote: "Democracy is in peril." - Ralph Nader (referring to turnout in the 1996 US presidential election)

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 112