We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reform of Abortion Laws
Details
Submitted by[?]: Principle Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2037
Description[?]:
Currently Abortions in the Dundorf Federation are permitted throughout the entire term of the pregnancy. This is inhumane and must be reformed to permit abortion only during the first trimester. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Policy on the legality of abortions
Old value:: All abortions are illegal.
Current: Abortion is allowed during the first and second trimesters.
Proposed: Abortion is allowed during the first trimester.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | not recorded | From | Principle Party | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | As a compromise it is important that the abortion laws be revamped. Currently the situation is incredibly unfair. |
Date | not recorded | From | Anarchista Kommunista Csapat | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | Your not going to win, you and the reform party are the only pro-lifers here. |
Date | not recorded | From | Principle Party | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | Thanks for the ringing endorcement my friend. But I am not necessarily pro-life. This proposal would suggest that choice is still important but that the period in which that choice can be made must be limited on the basis of sensible medical knowledge. |
Date | not recorded | From | Kommunistische Arbeitspartei | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | Nah. Sorry, pal. |
Date | not recorded | From | Moderate Libertarian Alliance Party | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | Good to see new active parties emerging. |
Date | not recorded | From | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | I change my vote to NO-since there is no chance of getting this bill through any way ( because of the pro-death predominace in Dundorf), I will stick to my pricipals and say no to any law that allows for any form of abortion at any stage of the pregnacy- life is life from conseption, unless the law recognizes this any debate over timeing is bollocks. Its like pointing a gun at someones head and saying would you like me to kill you now or in an hour? |
Date | not recorded | From | Anarchista Kommunista Csapat | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | What's wrong with being pro-death (although I prefer the term "anti-life")? |
Date | not recorded | From | Kommunistische Arbeitspartei | To | Debating the Reform of Abortion Laws |
Message | What about killing sperm before they've been conceived? What's the difference? I say, "No more baths or hot tubs" because that's killing what could become a fetus. Oh, while we're at it, periods are now illegal. After all, that egg could become a human... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 74 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731 |
Random quote: "Capitalism is what people do if you leave them alone" - Kenneth Minogue |