We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Luthorians Shalt Be Free!
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperium et Libertas Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2376
Description[?]:
There is no need for ID cards to be carried by our citizens, apart from when they are needed to acquire services from the state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:04:31, March 17, 2007 CET | From | Redneck Party | To | Debating the Luthorians Shalt Be Free! |
Message | Home grown terrorism is always a risk. That is why it was passed to begin with. Do you.. support those people? That is the only reason to support this bill. |
Date | 23:28:43, March 17, 2007 CET | From | Imperium et Libertas Party | To | Debating the Luthorians Shalt Be Free! |
Message | So, do you think that those people in question will have "terrorist" under their occupation perhaps? This bill does nothing to stop terrorism. The way to do that would be to seperate out the police and military. Which the honourable members opposite voted against. |
Date | 01:58:20, March 18, 2007 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Luthorians Shalt Be Free! |
Message | PLEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAASE stop insisting on this bill. It won't pass and we wont allow it to pass. This bill is very harmful to the security of our Holy Empire. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 39 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 116 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved." - Confucius |