Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5470
Next month in: 03:16:02
Server time: 20:43:57, April 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): DanivonX | JourneyKun | luthorian3059 | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Worker's Rights

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Democrats of Jakania

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2376

Description[?]:

Better rights for workers

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:42:54, March 18, 2007 CET
From Liberal Democratic Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights
MessageWe support this bill.

Date01:24:53, March 19, 2007 CET
From Jakanian Liberal Socialists
ToDebating the Worker's Rights
MessageWe are split two ways between the current and proposed legislation, can parties present arguements against and in favour?

Date01:50:02, March 19, 2007 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights
MessageIf employers cannot fire workers who have gone on strike, then there is no downside for a worker to strike, no risk. This would allow workers to strike over the most trivial matters, wasting precious factory time and potentially driving particularly delicate corporations out of business. Conversely, if employers are free to fire workers who go on strike, then there is an element of genuine risk, meaning that workers will only strike for legitimate concerns.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 254

no
  

Total Seats: 139

abstain
  

Total Seats: 87


Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar).

Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54