Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:39:55
Server time: 08:20:04, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Truth in Journalism Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Party of Moderates

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2379

Description[?]:

This bill's purpose is to stop false information concerning slander to be written, and thus, ensure truthfulness in journalism.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date10:58:03, March 21, 2007 CET
FromAldegar Freedom Party
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessageThe TCP supports this bill vehemently.

Date17:23:18, March 21, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessageWe can support this.

Date00:51:45, March 23, 2007 CET
FromIndependent Right
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessageEh, we can't think of a good reason to oppose it.

Date02:37:30, March 23, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessageSo, we can count on those who say "we support" to support?

Date10:28:07, March 23, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessageWe await the elections, only then will we truly know if it will get passed.

Date21:39:05, March 23, 2007 CET
FromParty of Moderates
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessageMay we ask what that means? The SD does realize the elections are still some time away, right? Is this going to be another case where it will be claimed that since a large amount of votes was made in your favor, that will mean that everything should continue as it is? Perhaps a large amount of votes means that the electorate wishes for a continuation of the improvements?

Date17:56:45, March 24, 2007 CET
FromSocial Democrats
ToDebating the Truth in Journalism Act
MessagePerhaps instead of the word elections, the word "voting procedure" would be more in order. In politics, nothing is sure until the day of the elections.

We support this and we will vote in favour.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 467

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
      

    Total Seats: 183


    Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game.

    Random quote: "I reject the cynical view that politics is a dirty business." - Richard M. Nixon

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 63