We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Office Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Communist Party of Aldegar
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2381
Description[?]:
We propose the full nationalisation of the post office. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:17:01, March 28, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | We don't need any private post offices when our state-run ones are much better. |
Date | 16:58:46, March 28, 2007 CET | From | Independent Right | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | We actually think this makes sense, as much as it pains us to vote with communists. |
Date | 17:17:10, March 28, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | The ALSP is sceptic to this bill as it increase the danger of sensure of the mails from potential nondemocratic governments. Although we are willing to support this at the moment as we still have other ways of communicating in this countries that is not monopolized by the government or any private power we would warn the other parties in this our cabinet that we in the ALSP value freedom higher then sosialism if we are forced to chose one of them, we don't consider "commercial freedom" a freedom. |
Date | 17:37:48, March 28, 2007 CET | From | Left Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | We don't support this, as it is unneccesary to abolish private post offices when they are already regulated enough to ensure that they provide a certain quality of service. |
Date | 21:56:53, March 28, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | This is just more communist reform by extremist and intolerant organizations that think private property is the work of the antichrist. |
Date | 21:57:47, March 28, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | Also, how in the world are our public ones better? Have you ever been to a government run monopolized function? What about FEMA? What about the DMV? Have those ever been better or more efficient than private areas? |
Date | 19:11:23, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Post Office Act |
Message | (ooc - just looked those two up - we dont have them in Britain). If this bill had gone through, then the people could have easily voted for the parties who didn't support it if they didn't like it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 257 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 352 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 41 |
Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
Random quote: The Wolfsheim Virus is not a real actual disease in the conventional medical sense of the term. Rather, it is a cluster of symptoms which are just part of the general socio-economic disease that is capitalism. The main symptoms the sufferers are experiencing are a direct result of capitalist poverty, as in malnutrition, poor housing and so on, combined with psycho-somatic symptoms which are a direct consequence of the contradictions and stresses which are inherent to the capitalist system. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer, General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party |