We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2382
Description[?]:
A bill to A) effectively and efficiently reduce the size and scope of the federal government of the Democratic Republic of Aloria and to B) increase national fiscal responsibility so as to reduce burdens on the individual taxpayer. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The patenting of software techniques.
Old value:: Software designs, techniques, formulae and algorithms cannot be patented.
Current: Software patents can be obtained from the patent office.
Proposed: Software patents can be obtained from the patent office.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 10:12:47, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Federal Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII) |
Message | Is this not government actually getting involved in something? |
Date | 12:40:43, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Socialanarchist Party | To | Debating the Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII) |
Message | Yes, and in a way that will greatly hinder research in the fields of maths, physics and most technology. |
Date | 14:26:20, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Militant Libertarian Front | To | Debating the Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII) |
Message | thus is the government getting involved in protecting intellectual property rights...a legitimate function of government |
Date | 15:43:06, March 29, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII) |
Message | I concur. If you prohibit patents you stifle vital invention. Why invent something, when it becomes the state's property to utilize and profit from? You're brain came-up with the idea, why does the king...'er legislature get a cut? |
Date | 16:55:57, March 30, 2007 CET | From | Federal Social Democratic Party | To | Debating the Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII) |
Message | Don't get us wrong, we support this bill, it is just funny seeing your hyprocracy once more |
Date | 06:42:53, March 31, 2007 CET | From | Moderate Libertarian Party (NoCoalition) | To | Debating the Limited Government Act of 2381 (Part XVIII) |
Message | Protecting personal property rights is, again, NOT hypocrisy. The MLP are not anarchists. We believe in law and limited government. Sorry, if you'd prefer people's individual creations automatically belong to the government just because YOUR PARTY says so. That's bunk! If you want an absolute monarchy approach to property, just come-out in favor of feudalism and save us all a little time. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 498 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 102 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
Random quote: "More Medicament Manufacture take the profits, workers take the factory" - Boros Norbert, former Endralonian businessman |