Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 03:52:23
Server time: 08:07:36, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of December 2381

Details

Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Alternative

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2382

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:46:09, March 30, 2007 CET
From Centrist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2381
MessageThis is clearly the cabinet proposal we support. The fewer the number of parties, the easier it is to manage.

The motion can be put forward, it has our support.

Date22:21:01, March 30, 2007 CET
From Christian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2381
MessageIt is true that a coalition is more stable with fewer parties. This has been a long-established political fact in the Netherlands, in which coalition governments are the rule.

Date08:39:59, March 31, 2007 CET
From Conservative Union Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of December 2381
MessageThis is better than ours. Support

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 66

no
   

Total Seats: 45

abstain
 

Total Seats: 14


Random fact: Before creating a party organisation, check to see whether there are any existing organisations which cover the same agenda.

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 49