Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: March 5472
Next month in: 01:58:03
Server time: 02:01:56, April 20, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Encouraging entrepreneurs.

Details

Submitted by[?]: Adam Smith Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: March 2087

Description[?]:

While the tax rate on corporate profits is the same as that on investment income, there is no incentive for the wealth of Lodamun to be put to use in generating employment and improvements in the standard of living of the average citizen. Thus we propose to reduce this taxation a few percent to encourage industrial and corporate investment in Lodamun rather than in offshore tax havens.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date04:26:32, July 26, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
MessageWhere does it say that the tax on corporate profits is the same as that on investment income?

Date04:57:08, July 26, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
Message((We only have the one tax at the moment (why this one?) which was at a default value. As other taxes are also at the default value they are the same. That is my argument anyway))

Date05:31:03, July 26, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
Messageno objection to a small tax cut.

Date17:46:24, July 26, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
MessageA 5% reduction seems like a good start.

Does anyone know if we will be able to have a tax system like the "fair tax" (national sales tax with living expenses rebate) plan?

Date18:28:22, July 26, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
Message((No details of how the economy is to work have been forthcomming yet))

Date17:36:47, July 27, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
MessageSo the AFL wants to keep taxation high. Is that not contradictory?

Date18:10:50, July 27, 2005 CET
FromCNT/AFL
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
MessageWe're an anarchist political party, we've always been inherently contradictory.

Date18:33:26, July 27, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
MessageTouché

Date16:51:44, July 28, 2005 CET
FromAdam Smith Party
ToDebating the Encouraging entrepreneurs.
MessageWell the voting here has been as expected.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 231

no
   

Total Seats: 179

abstain
  

Total Seats: 40


Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363

Random quote: "The proletarians of the world have nothing to lose but their chains. They have a world to win. Workers of all countries: unite!" - Karl Marx

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62