We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2383
Description[?]:
The Government should not be allowed to take your land. They have no right to. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may not seize private property.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:00:23, March 31, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Alliance | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | Then why are you proposing that 'The government may seize private property for any reason.'? |
Date | 14:45:30, March 31, 2007 CET | From | Republican Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | Oopps i must have click the wrong one. |
Date | 00:07:17, April 01, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | I actually agree. |
Date | 01:27:47, April 01, 2007 CET | From | United Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Act |
Message | An excellent bill |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 259 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 342 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life quotations may be used in Particracy, but the real-life speaker or author should always be referenced in an OOC (out-of-character) note alongside the quotation. |
Random quote: "An independent is someone who wants to take the politics out of politics." - Adlai Stevenson |