We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Government regulation of hunting
Details
Submitted by[?]: Centrist Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2383
Description[?]:
. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Current: Hunting and fishing is not regulated.
Proposed: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:28:03, April 02, 2007 CET | From | New Democratic Party | To | Debating the Government regulation of hunting |
Message | ...I suppose local yahoos and holigans deciding hunting policy is better than no policy at all... |
Date | 23:57:29, April 02, 2007 CET | From | Centrist Party | To | Debating the Government regulation of hunting |
Message | They are called provinces - not yahoos. But close! LOL. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 56 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 69 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
Random quote: "I've been against the death penalty since I was in law school in 1950. It's horrible, discriminatory, and undermines the credibility of the criminal justice system." - Ralph Nader |