We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Criminal Apprehension Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Party of Moderates
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2385
Description[?]:
| In order to help with the capture and conviction of violent criminals, it is necesary to make a slight change to the policy towards the violation of private letters. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The confidentiality of letters and correspondence.
Old value:: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate it in extreme situations.
Current: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Proposed: The confidentiality of letters is inviolable, but the justice dept. can violate the confidentiality of letters with grounded cause.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 09:57:12, April 03, 2007 CET | From | Aldegar Freedom Party | To | Debating the Criminal Apprehension Act |
| Message | This proposal is reasonable. Afterall, what is more important - the detainment of a criminal, or the criminals right to privacy? Surely it is the former; we should take any lengths nessicary to capture criminals, even if those lengths go beyond the restraints of an illusive set of human rights that limit the extent of this nation's justice. The TCP supports. |
| Date | 16:57:53, April 03, 2007 CET | From | Communist Party of Aldegar | To | Debating the Criminal Apprehension Act |
| Message | We will support this - it seems reasonable. |
| Date | 15:11:05, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Greenpeace Party | To | Debating the Criminal Apprehension Act |
| Message | We can support. |
| Date | 20:28:59, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Criminal Apprehension Act |
| Message | We belive that here is no cause that is good enough to violate peoples privacy. |
| Date | 20:28:59, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Criminal Apprehension Act |
| Message | We belive that there is no cause that is good enough to violate peoples privacy. |
| Date | 20:43:17, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the Criminal Apprehension Act |
| Message | What about murder? What about conspiracies that endanger many people? Surely you can see the reason behind this proposal? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 381 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 221 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 48 |
| Random fact: You can view helpful ideological statistics about the regions in your nation on the region pages. You can also view detailed political opinions and the importance of them there as well. |
| Random quote: "Socialists like to tout their confiscation and redistribution schemes as noble and caring, but we should ask if theft is ever noble or caring." - Robert Hawes |