We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: D.D.L. 001/2384
Details
Submitted by[?]: S.C.A.F.R.
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2384
Description[?]:
| - |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Current: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Current: The state owns national defence industries but these exist alongside privately owned defence industries.
Proposed: The state owns all defence industries.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the export of weapons to other nations.
Old value:: The government must approve all arms sales on a case by case basis.
Current: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Proposed: The government allows arms to be sold only to close allies.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:43:37, April 03, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the D.D.L. 001/2384 |
| Message | No. The defense industry is much useful when it's partially privatized, the policy towards arms exporting is good since we can review each case, and the policy towards WMDs is unacceptable because they aren't necesary and unlike nuclear weapons, aren't as good of a deterrant. |
| Date | 02:11:41, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Party of Moderates | To | Debating the D.D.L. 001/2384 |
| Message | What was the point of making a bill that you knew would fail? |
| Date | 09:55:43, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Greenpeace Party | To | Debating the D.D.L. 001/2384 |
| Message | We can't vote the second article. Change it and banned the use of NBC weapons. So we support the bill. |
| Date | 15:43:23, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Greenpeace Party | To | Debating the D.D.L. 001/2384 |
| Message | We dont saw changement. So We dont support this bill. |
| Date | 20:26:50, April 04, 2007 CET | From | Aldegarian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the D.D.L. 001/2384 |
| Message | We in the ALSP are mostly pasifists... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 225 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 228 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 197 |
| Random fact: Particracy has been running since 2005. Dorvik was Particracy's first nation, the Dorvik Social Democrats the first party and the International Greens the first Party Organisation. |
| Random quote: "A democracy that does not allow limits is not a democracy. Just as a limitless freedom is not freedom, but prevarication. Indeed, any theory of freedom worthy of this name is first of all a limit theory. If we extend the unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not willing to defend a tolerant society against the attacks of the intolerants, then the tolerants will be destroyed and the tolerance with them! Because, I ask to myself and ask you, given a certain system that we call democratic, which is today the best possible system to allow everyone to live freely and to be able to express their own thoughts, how can the same system admit attacks against its integrity? How can a system refuse the principle of the self-preservation? For this reason, to suppress the apologetics of thalerrism, it's for this reason that the exaltation of exegetes, principles, facts or methods of Thallerism and its anti-democratic aims does not constitute a violation of the freedom of manifestation of thought, but, on the contrary, the celebration of that freedom. The protection of the first premise on which a modern democratic system is based. And this premise must be safeguarded also and above all against itself and its abuses." ~ Malik Astori, Leadership of Liberty and Progress (Istalia) |