We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Common Military Incentives and Values Treaty
Details
Submitted by[?]: Covenanters (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2385
Description[?]:
| This bill asks for the ratification of the Common Military Incentives and Values Treaty. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Common Military Incentives and Values Treaty.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 01:11:10, April 05, 2007 CET | From | Imperium et Libertas Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Common Military Incentives and Values Treaty |
| Message | We're largely against tying our hands up with too many treaties... |
| Date | 05:06:12, April 05, 2007 CET | From | Christian People's Party (IA) | To | Debating the Ratification of the Common Military Incentives and Values Treaty |
| Message | this will weaken our military |
| Date | 10:11:27, April 05, 2007 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Common Military Incentives and Values Treaty |
| Message | Although article 4 is not very appreciated, we will vote yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 83 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 60 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 12 |
| Random fact: Players are expected to behave in a courteous, co-operative manner and make a reasonable effort to act with the consent of all players involved, even where the rules do not make consent strictly necessary. In particular, players have a responsibility to take reasonable care that other players are not misinformed either about the role-play or the Game Rules. |
| Random quote: "A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless." - Antonin Scalia |