Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 02:33:47
Server time: 13:26:12, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): aai14 | AethanKal | Dx6743 | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Full Suffrage Act III

Details

Submitted by[?]: Freedom Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2087

Description[?]:

Can we go all the way?

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:11:37, July 26, 2005 CET
From Fair Capitalism Party
ToDebating the Full Suffrage Act III
MessageWe beleive it is right for younger people to be able to vote, and have the rights of an adult.

Date00:06:40, July 28, 2005 CET
FromNew Fascist Satanist Party
ToDebating the Full Suffrage Act III
MessageMmmmm, even though this is a good idea the younger people don't have as much maturity and life experiance as a person older then them. I think that the legal age to be an adult should be 21. But since that's not happening yet I'll go with a no.

Date22:33:02, July 28, 2005 CET
FromFreedom Party
ToDebating the Full Suffrage Act III
MessageOh good, you fixed your name.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 178

no
 

Total Seats: 16

abstain
     

Total Seats: 206


Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51