Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5471
Next month in: 03:20:38
Server time: 12:39:21, April 19, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): burgerboys | LC73DunMHP | Xalvas | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Frist Amendments

Details

Submitted by[?]: Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2385

Description[?]:

This series of legislation tends to the needs of our country. We need to amend existing laws in several areas as listed below.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:51:28, April 05, 2007 CET
From Liberal Democratic Party
ToDebating the Frist Amendments
Message"I agree with Articles 1 and 3. However we oppose Articles 2 and 4. It is my belief that the Local Governments should handle Article 4 according to what their populous wants and that the Federal Government shouldn't decide what a local community does in this field. As for Article 2, the National Energy Corporations have been doing a fine job and this law needs no changing.

I yield the floor."

- L.D.P. Minority Leader Sherrod Brown

Date01:48:19, April 05, 2007 CET
From Moderate Republican Party
ToDebating the Frist Amendments
MessageDue to APSC committments, we regretably vote "no" on this issue. We fully support Articles One, Two and Three, but are not sure of Article Four.

We do not understand why the LDP and other APSC parties opposes Article Two. Instead of one nationalized energy provider, citizens will be able to choose a private energy provider. Also, the services the private companies provide will be regulated to ensure that prices are not extraordinarily high. Having energy corporations compete against each other will provide citizens with better, higher quality service, and it will create additional jobs. We believe that a nationalized energy corporation can be corrupt and set high prices knowing citizens will have no other option for energy service.

We would also like to ask the LDP how they come to the assumption that the nationalized energy company is doing a fine job.

Date01:52:22, April 05, 2007 CET
From United Democrats of Jakania
ToDebating the Frist Amendments
Message"Because the Minister of Infrastructure Charles McArthur says it is"
(if LDP would let us speak on there behalf)
-Charles McArthur, UDJ

Date01:56:49, April 05, 2007 CET
From Moderate Republican Party
ToDebating the Frist Amendments
MessageWe still stick to our belief that privatising energy with regulations and restrictions would be better for Jakania. It would allow different energy companies to compete against each other and force them to devise new ways to better serve the Jakanian people.

Date15:02:05, April 05, 2007 CET
From Scientific Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Frist Amendments
MessageWe are entirely in favour of privatising industry, especially those so vital as energy. Government-run industries are at best woefully inefficient, at worst... well, much worse.
However, civil rights are even more important to us than economic freedom, so we must vote no.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 0

no
       

Total Seats: 480

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Particracy isn't just a game, it also has a forum, where players meet up to discuss role-playing, talk about in-game stuff, run their own newspaper or organisation and even discuss non-game and real-life issues! Check it out: http://forum.particracy.net/

    Random quote: "The true revolutionary is guided by great feelings of love. It is impossible to think of a genuine revolutionary lacking this quality." - Che Guevara

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 76