Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5460
Next month in: 02:35:26
Server time: 13:24:33, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Brazil25 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Seat Redistribution Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Catholic Workers Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2385

Description[?]:

OOC: I have a fun district map where I can color in "districts" in each Canton for every seat a party wins there. Unfortunately it's for 300 seats. If we want to use it again for RP (I would), we'd have to go back to 300 seats.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:36:51, April 05, 2007 CET
FromNational Fasco-Communist Order
ToDebating the Seat Redistribution Act
MessageWon't you have to re-draw it anyways because the amount of seats per Canton changes?

Date22:42:29, April 05, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Seat Redistribution Act
MessageNah, it'd be really easy if we change it. I'd only have to add a line or two in here and there. If we keep it at 600 we can't use the map though, because I don't have the stamina to redraw 600 districts.

Here's a link to the old district map:
http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m84/NealMey/TelamonDistricts.jpg?t=1175805421

And what it looks like colored in:
http://i102.photobucket.com/albums/m84/NealMey/Election2295.png?t=1175805673

I really enjoyed using them, and they would be great to incorporate back into the gameplay. That's the only reason I support this bill.

Date19:54:00, April 06, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Seat Redistribution Act
MessageOpinions?

Date21:34:33, April 06, 2007 CET
FromConservative Alliance
ToDebating the Seat Redistribution Act
MessageWould this affect the number of seats parties could win, or would they be exactly the same proportionally, just lower in real numbers?

OOC: Yes, we are worried about losing even more seats :)

Date01:44:24, April 07, 2007 CET
FromCatholic Workers Union
ToDebating the Seat Redistribution Act
MessageJust lower in real numbers. You'd still have the same proportion of seats.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 206

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
        

    Total Seats: 395


    Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

    Random quote: "Hatred is not, and should never be considered as another form of freedom of expression." - Icarion Dadhelus, former Selucian politician

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 53