We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Higher Education Privatisation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Liberal Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2386
Description[?]:
This bill reintroduces the proposals to privatise higher education in Telamon |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Higher education institutions.
Old value:: The government maintains a system of universities, vocational schools, and colleges nationwide.
Current: The government maintains a system of universities, vocational schools, and colleges nationwide.
Proposed: The government does not maintain any forms of higher education.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The regulation of higher education.
Old value:: The government allows private higher education but regulates it to meet nationally set standards.
Current: The government allows public and private higher education institutions to coexist with self-regulation for those that are private.
Proposed: The government does not fund any public higher education institutions, permitting only private higher education institutions to exist.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:59:37, April 05, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Higher Education Privatisation Act |
Message | "Why? This makes no sense, since you are not legalizing private colleges, they're already legal, but you're defunding and disbanding public colleges which provide educations to millions of students." -Sarah Swide CPA Education Director |
Date | 01:11:52, April 08, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Higher Education Privatisation Act |
Message | How can you vote for this when there's been so much opposition mobilized: http://www.takeforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1887&start=300&mforum=particracy |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 170 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 264 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 167 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "'The illusion of Pontesi nationhood'. The Serpent speaks. How can they say these things? How can they call our country an illusion? You can see it clear as day, these people won’t stop until they’ve destroyed us all." - Morgan Einar, former Pontesian general |