We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Eminent Domain Compensation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: RSDP - Democratic Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2087
Description[?]:
An Act to determine the national policy regarding the compensation for expropriation and eminent domain. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent domain compensation (if eminent domain is legal).
Old value:: The government does not compensate victims of eminent domain.
Current: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Proposed: A neutral body appointed by the courts determines the compensation, either party may appeal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:41:56, July 26, 2005 CET | From | Humanist Socialist Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
Message | Fair dos. |
Date | 23:26:19, July 26, 2005 CET | From | Grand Republican Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
Message | Sounds fair. |
Date | 00:02:09, July 27, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
Message | "Eminent Domain"??? |
Date | 09:54:15, July 27, 2005 CET | From | RSDP - Democratic Front | To | Debating the Eminent Domain Compensation Act |
Message | Private property seized by the Government for vital public works. ;-) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 359 | |||||||
no | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 198 |
Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
Random quote: "A theory that seems to explain everything is just as good at explaining nothing"- Christopher Hitchens |