We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: International Relations and Eminent Domain Bill 2386
Details
Submitted by[?]: God's and the King's Fighters
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2387
Description[?]:
| Ad 1: The government should have the possibility to seize private property, if this had to happen for the greater good, the greater good not being some abstract ideas, but more something along the lines of military goods, or other areas that are still left to the state, like power stations. Ad 2: If our people want to help other countries, they can do that by individual donations ore NGOs, but they shouldn't be forced to do this by the state. Ad 3: If we welcome fugitives, we should help them integrate, in order to prevent higher criminality. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Eminent Domain.
Old value:: The government may not seize private property.
Current: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Proposed: The government may seize private property for vital government works.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The national refugee policy.
Old value:: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; no aid is given to them.
Current: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Proposed: Only refugees that are victims of extreme circumstances are welcome; they are given integration-aid.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:01:45, April 09, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the International Relations and Eminent Domain Bill 2386 |
| Message | We agree with articles 1 and 2, but not with article 3. We think everyone, refugee or not, should be welcomed in our country, but we shouldn't give aid to them. |
| Date | 20:22:03, April 09, 2007 CET | From | Christian Democratic Alternative | To | Debating the International Relations and Eminent Domain Bill 2386 |
| Message | We can agree with this bill if you drop article 2. To the UFD, you have to right to your opinion, but your opinion on article 3 was proven to be a naive one in the Netherlands in 2002. Fortuyn got so many votes because he rejected an all welcome policy without integration help. I didn't vote for him, but I could understand his resistance to it. |
| Date | 10:25:11, April 10, 2007 CET | From | "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party | To | Debating the International Relations and Eminent Domain Bill 2386 |
| Message | Could agree to the last one but certainly not to any of the other two... |
| Date | 13:08:57, April 10, 2007 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the International Relations and Eminent Domain Bill 2386 |
| Message | Two has gone. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 36 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 193 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where players have failed to clearly and accurately reference their nation's RP laws in the "Bills under debate" section, Moderation will rule them invalid if a challenge is made to their validity. |
| Random quote: "A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government." - George Washington |