We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness
Details
Submitted by[?]: "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2387
Description[?]:
| ... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Sales tax on luxury goods.
Old value:: 0
Current: 27
Proposed: 15
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on Democratic Workers' Councils.
Old value:: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Current: The government does not intervene in the marketplace with regards to Democratic Workers' Councils.
Proposed: The government encourages the formation of Democratic Workers' Councils through subsidies and tax exemptions.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:30:11, April 10, 2007 CET | From |  Conservative Union Party | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness |
| Message | I'm sure you know what I think... |
| Date | 11:58:07, April 10, 2007 CET | From | United Forces of Decay | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness |
| Message | No. Never. |
| Date | 13:13:45, April 10, 2007 CET | From | God's and the King's Fighters | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness |
| Message | Democratic Worker's Councils are an abolishment unto almost every God, and luxury goods should be available for everyone, only number 1 would be acceptable. |
| Date | 20:36:15, April 10, 2007 CET | From | Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM) | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness |
| Message | The Centrists are in favour? |
| Date | 02:14:51, April 11, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness |
| Message | Support |
| Date | 02:26:37, April 11, 2007 CET | From | Socialist Party of Hutori | To | Debating the Aesthetic and pacifist bill 2386 concerning economic implicitness |
| Message | GKF-obviously you haven't read Acts Chapter 11 |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 95 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 134 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to make a reasonable effort to be accurate when communicating the rules to other players. Any player who manipulatively misleads another player about the rules will be subject to sanction. |
| Random quote: "If a female president can come here and be treated equally, why can't any other woman?" - Jewell C. Stillman, former Lourennais politician (on equal rights in Badara) |