Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5461
Next month in: 02:08:17
Server time: 21:51:42, March 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Formation Act 2387

Details

Submitted by[?]: Christian Democratic Alternative

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2388

Description[?]:

In the past years there has been a number of government crises. The CDA links the this high number of incidents to the fact that every party can propose cabinets. The largest party has the clearest mandate from the people and should take the lead in cabinet formations.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:25:36, April 11, 2007 CET
From God's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageThis is against democracy, even in a constitutional monarchy like Hutore. (OOC: And it's less fun)

Date17:58:04, April 11, 2007 CET
From Christian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageLess fun? Maybe. Less democracy? Certainly not! Better government? With 1000% certainty.

Date18:09:01, April 11, 2007 CET
From Conservative Union Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageGood idea.

Date18:24:03, April 11, 2007 CET
From God's and the King's Fighters
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageWhy should such a government be better?

Date19:22:42, April 11, 2007 CET
From Centrist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageIts a game. that you agree that its less fun should point out the obvious. less fun means worst for game players.. which you and i are... the goal should be fun, not better government...

Date20:24:11, April 11, 2007 CET
From United Forces of Decay
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageAlthough we proposed similar bills in the past, we agree with the Centrists now that it should be left the way it is. And we think that our current government is quite a stable and good one...

Date20:30:24, April 11, 2007 CET
From "Le Chaim" - Aesthetic Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageIt is indeed fine as it is...

Date20:31:32, April 11, 2007 CET
From Christian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageEverything that's rotten and decaying is good for the UFD.

Date20:37:38, April 11, 2007 CET
From Christian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageThe government will be better because more stable coalitions with less parties can be formed. This proposal doesn't necessarily means less fun because you can through compromise still get into government. You really must use your negotiation talents to the fullest.

Date20:44:45, April 11, 2007 CET
From United Forces of Decay
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageAt CDA: That's right...

Date23:40:12, April 11, 2007 CET
From Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageCDA - how can you possibly claim that it's more democratic? It's not at all!

Date17:49:13, April 12, 2007 CET
From Christian Democratic Alternative
ToDebating the Cabinet Formation Act 2387
MessageInstability is per definition undemocratic because it undermines the ability of a democracy to function.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 66

no
      

Total Seats: 163

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Moderation reserves the discretion to declare RP laws invalid if the players supporting them are doing so in an excessively confrontational way.

    Random quote: "We’ve got to stand with our North Korean allies." - Sarah Palin

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 83