We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Energy Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Marxist Peoples Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2389
Description[?]:
| This plan would create cheaper energy for the masses |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:42:30, April 11, 2007 CET | From | Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | I can support the first, but not the second. |
| Date | 00:26:44, April 12, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | Neither appear to be very appealing. |
| Date | 22:46:50, April 12, 2007 CET | From | Marxist Peoples Party | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | what's unappealing about it? nuclear energy is more efficient and the people need full control of their electricity |
| Date | 16:23:50, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | Sorry, other way around, I love nuclear power, which is why I put through a treaty ensuring our continued commitment to nuclear power. I can support this act. |
| Date | 17:43:07, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | Mostly the first proposal. It seems to suggest that even solar panels would be illegal. However, we have deep reservations when it comes to nuclear power, especially the inability to effectively deal with the waste. |
| Date | 22:20:55, April 13, 2007 CET | From | Marxist Peoples Party | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | I hate to betray the left on this one, but I'm going to drop the second proposal so this can pass |
| Date | 10:24:04, April 14, 2007 CET | From | Conservative Alliance | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | Feel free to betray the left, even if you are a Marxist. Many apparent Marxists have done so in the past... |
| Date | 14:23:22, April 14, 2007 CET | From | Popular Socialist Front | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | The PSF will never support nuclear power |
| Date | 18:08:52, April 14, 2007 CET | From | Catholic Workers Union | To | Debating the Energy Act |
| Message | To the Marxists: it's alright. We've done it too often ourselves to criticize anyone else. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 294 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 140 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 167 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "George W. Bush will protect your unborn fetus, then send your grown child to die in war." - Rick Claro |